How we work
Most agencies sell you a methodology. We would rather show you exactly what happens, week by week, and what you get to keep at the end of it.
Your first conversation is with someone who will actually build the thing, not a salesperson reading a deck. We ask the awkward questions early — about deadlines, budget and the constraint you have not mentioned yet — because they are far cheaper now than in month four.
A short scoping exercise covering the problem, the constraints, the deadline and the risks. You leave with a written plan: deliverables, milestones, timeline and cost. If we think the project is a bad idea, or that you do not need us, we say so at this stage.
Two-week cycles with working software at the end of each one, and a board you can read without booking a meeting. You talk directly to the engineers doing the work. Decisions are written down, so nothing important lives only in one person's head.
Production launch, documentation and a genuine handover — repositories, infrastructure, credentials and the reasoning behind the decisions. The work is yours. We stay useful because you keep choosing us, not because you are locked in.
What you can hold us to
IP in the deliverables is assigned to you in the services agreement. Repositories, infrastructure and credentials are handed over at the end of the engagement.
We run on GMT+1 as the reference timezone and hold a minimum four-hour overlap with your team, so decisions happen in conversation rather than in a queue.
Encryption, least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication as standard, with a 24-hour incident reporting commitment written into our contracts.
Architecture decisions, trade-offs and rejected options are documented. When someone new joins — on our side or yours — the context is already there.
A conversation with an engineer costs you nothing and tells you more than any proposal document.
